The Hypothesis of Stock Market Instruments: Modern Aspects, Forms and Anomalies

The relevance of the results of the presented research is also related to their demand both from investors and issuers and from research scientists. For research scientists, the predictability of profitability or the lack of such predictability is crucial for creating models that would be able to accurately describe risks and profitability in financial markets. The methods and techniques used in the study allow us to determine the general trend of the market movement toward increasing or decreasing its efficiency. For investors, such an assessment of the effectiveness of the stock and bond markets creates a basis for optimizing asset allocation when building portfolio strategies, and for issuers serves as the basis for building a strategy for issuing activities. The subject of the study is the totality of economic relations between stock market participants in the process of assessing its effectiveness and volatility in the Republic of Kazakhstan. The theoretical basis was the results of fundamental research contained in the scientific works of foreign and Russian scientists and presented in the modern literature on the problems of evaluating the effectiveness and modeling the volatility of the stock market and building investment strategies. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the development of theoretical provisions and methodological tools for assessing the effectiveness of the Kazakhstan stock market in modern conditions.

1. Fama, E. Market Efficiency, Long-Term Returns, and Behavioral Finance / E. Fama // Journal of Financial Economics. – 1998. – Vol. 49. – Issue 3. – P. 283–306

2. Shleifer, A. Inefficient Markets: An Introduction to Behavioural Finance. (Clarendon Lectures in Economics) / A. Shleifer. – Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2000. – 224 p.

3. Sharp U., Aleksander G., Beyli Dzh. (1998) Investitsii [Investments]. M.: INFRA-M, p. 975

4. Handbook of modern finance. Editor d.e. Logue. Warren, Gorham, Lamont. – Boston – New York. – 1984, p. I-32

5. Aarons M., Ender V., Wilkinson A. Securitization Swapsː A Practitioner`s Handbook. – January, 2019, p. 232.

6. Tyulz R., Bredli E., Tyulz T. (1997) Fondovyy rynok [Stock Market]. M.: INFRA-M, p. 3

7. Рубцов Б.Б. Зарубежные фондовые рынки: инструменты, структура, механизм функционирования. – М.: ИНФРА-М, 1996. – С. 17

8. Миркин Я.М. Рынок ценных бумаг России: воздействие фундаментальных факторов, прогноз и политика развития. – М.: Альпина Паблишер, 2012. – С. 91

9. Алёхин Б.И. Рынок ценных бумаг. Введение в фондовые операции. – М.: Финансы и статистика, 2014. – С. 6.

10. Адамбекова А.А. Финансовый рынок Казахстана: становление и развитие. – Алматы, 2007. – 118 с.

11. Додонов В. Казахстанский фондовый рынок в условиях глобального финансового кризиса // Аналитический журнал «Рынок ценных бумаг Казахстана». – 2008. – № 12. – С. 29

12. Fama, E. F. Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds / E. F. Fama, K. R. French // Journal of Financial Economics, University of Chicago. – 1993. – Vol. 33. – P. 3–56

13. Rozeff, M. Capital Market Seasonality: The Case of Stock Returns / M. Rozeff, W. Kinney // Journal of Financial Economics. – 1976. – Vol. 3. – No 4. – P. 379– 402

14. Brandimarte P. An Introduction to Financial Marketsː A Quantitative Approach. – October, 2017, p. 84

15. FIA Annual Global Futures and Options Volume: gains in North America and Europe offset declines in Asia-Pacific. – 2016, p. 81, www.fimag.fia.org

16. Buitron C., Vesperoni E. (2015) Spill over Implications of Differences in Monetary Conditions in the United States and the Euro Area. International Monetary Fund, p. 112

17. Overview of Dow Jones Averages (2016) p.12, www.djaverages.com